On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 March 2017 at 16:01, Tim Harvey <thar...@gateworks.com> wrote: >> diff --git >> a/target/linux/imx6/files-4.9/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5904.dtsi >> b/target/linux/imx6/files-4.9/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5904.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..4503f2c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/target/linux/imx6/files-4.9/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5904.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,629 @@ >> +/* >> + * Copyright 2017 Gateworks Corporation >> + * >> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public >> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License >> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations: >> + * >> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html >> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html >> + */ >> + >> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > > Hi Tim, > > Is Gateworks very strict to the GPL licensing DTS files? Would that be > OK to release this under some BSD-compatible license? Please take a > look at my previous short e-mail: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2017-February/005842.html > > -- > Rafał
Rafal, How about the dual GPL/X11 license that the kernel/dt folks like? see https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg569234.html Tim _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev