Hi Alberto, Hi Eric, thank you for getting into this. I'm quite the oposite of a legal expert, so this might all just as well be rather meaningless FUD.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:26:02PM +0000, Alberto Bursi wrote: > ... > Again I'm not seeing anything evil. > > I tend to see any accusatory article as highly suspicious unless they > quote fully the bad parts of the documents they use as proof of > wrongdoings, and neither of those you cited does. I might be spoiled > brat, but that rule of thumb has never let me down. Sounds very reasonable to me. From what I understood that was all about partial quotes which show up as part of search-results and the github website without the attribution required or full-text license next to it. In a way that sounded like an excuse, because they could just embed the required text-blocks into the site and display them on-mouse-over of the SPDX tag, which would technically speaking make that change in their usage terms unnessecary, thus I got suspicous. Cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
