On 1/21/17 11:44 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 03:50:50 +0000 > Eric Luehrsen <ericluehr...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Dave, >> >> May I quote you for pull requests to achieve "dnsmasq: make DHCPv6 >> work in standalone dnsmasq installation": >> https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/704 >> https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/674
goforit >> > > Is there any interest / any effort to use the ISC DHCP server instead > of either dnsmasq and/or odhcpd on bigger devices? Certainly one of my > back burner projects has the been the whole 'maximum user choice' > thing with things like being able to use the same configs with one's > preferred DNS/DHCP as well as the GNU coreutils and other 'full' > commands instead of busybox for that that wish it. Basically where > there are other options in open source, allowing users to choose their > poison (since no one solution is perfect for all situations). Ideally > one could also substitute systemd or openrc.d for procd based init if > one so chooses. Basically instead of LEDE/OpenWrt being a > one-size-fits-all solution, I'd like to see it be more a build system > that allows you to choose your solutions. (Which is what LEDE name > implies vs. a distribution; LEDE/OpenWrt as a distribution is a > particular set of choices in my view and is actually a separate > project). I'd like to have a one size fits all solution that works in all cases, and to expend the effort to make it perfect. That said, well... I know this guy (cc'd) that regulary runs the isc stuff on his openwrt boxes..... > > Regards, > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
