On 09.01.2017 15:25, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
Hi,While investigating an issue with module loading order¹, I discovered that some kernel packages use AutoProbe, like this: AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoProbe,xt_hashlimit) while some kernel packages use the AutoLoad helper I was used to, with a priority: AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoLoad,28,raid0) Judging from this commit² and `include/kernel.mk`, it seems the only difference is that AutoProbe does not include a priority. Is the loading order determined automatically for AutoProbe? If so, where is the magic, and why is AutoLoad still needed in some cases? Thanks, Baptiste ¹ https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/3790 ² https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=commitdiff;h=022cadd64e8a24818d15b22bc28f3460e0b2519c _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
I opened the issue, so using autoload the modules will get a priority specified by the number, for wireguard above 90 would issue only one warning and using autoprobe the module would be loaded by the order of the name ? so setting the xt_hashlimit with a lower number (autoload) will start wireguard without complaining
Regards _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
