On 09.01.2017 15:25, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
Hi,
While investigating an issue with module loading order¹, I discovered that
some kernel packages use AutoProbe, like this:
AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoProbe,xt_hashlimit)
while some kernel packages use the AutoLoad helper I was used to, with a
priority:
AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoLoad,28,raid0)
Judging from this commit² and `include/kernel.mk`, it seems the only
difference is that AutoProbe does not include a priority.
Is the loading order determined automatically for AutoProbe? If so, where
is the magic, and why is AutoLoad still needed in some cases?
Thanks,
Baptiste
¹ https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/3790
²
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=commitdiff;h=022cadd64e8a24818d15b22bc28f3460e0b2519c
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
I opened the issue, so using autoload the modules will get a priority
specified by the number, for wireguard above 90 would issue only one
warning and using autoprobe the module would be loaded by the order of
the name ? so setting the xt_hashlimit with a lower number (autoload)
will start wireguard without complaining
Regards
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev