> On Jan 1, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Weedy <weedy2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 31 December 2016 at 20:23, Philip Prindeville > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: >> >> >> Pruning useful subtargets to solve a buildbot resource shortage seems like >> taking a sledgehammer to kill a fly. >> >> Why not instead just add a profile attribute like: >> >> BUILDBOT_BUILD_ME:=no >> >> Whether it’s still useful to *build* a subtarget is a different question >> that whether it’s still useful (from a pedagogical perspective) to *keep* a >> subtarget in the SCM… and these questions shouldn’t be conflated. >> >> -Philip > > > If this is going to be the road we travel down (I'm bikeshedding here) > wouldn't a BUILDBOT_INTERVAL:=daily/3d/7d/14d make more sense? > > We have more then a few full on targets that for the most part are > much less popular then say ar71xx.
That’s an even better idea. -Philip _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
