On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:54 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > Hi Tim, >
Hi John, > we currently have these patches in the tree, which i think you were > involved in. could you tell us which of these can be sent upstream > and/or what is blocking us sending them upstream ? > > 160-usb-gadget-udc-net2280-add-usb2380-support.patch:From: Tim Harvey > <thar...@gateworks.com> I mainlined this one (5185c91385d73cdf79836eb8548e4726e43ae831) and it appears in Linux 4.8 > 412-mtd-partial_eraseblock_unlock.patch:From: Tim Harvey > <thar...@gateworks.com> The commit message for this applied in OpenWrt r33681 on 10/10/12 was: mtd: allow partial block unlock This allows sysupgrade for devices such as the Gateworks Avila/Cambria product families based on the ixp4xx using the redboot bootloader with combined FIS directory and RedBoot config partitions on larger FLASH devices with larger eraseblocks. This second iteration of this patch addresses previous issues: - whitespace breakage fixed - unlock in all scenarios - simplification and fix logic bug ------ The ixp4xx Xscale processors have been EOL for a couple of years and as such there are no plans to mainline this. I don't see Gateworks Avila/Cambria in the LEDE Table of hardware (they are still in the OpenWrt list). Perhaps there is a plan to drop ixp4xx support from LEDE in general, which I would be fine with. > 880-gateworks_system_controller.patch:Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey > <thar...@gateworks.com> This is an old driver replaced by a newer version which I intend on mainlining - drop it. Tim _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
