On 7 December 2016 at 22:45, Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> wrote: > This just adds the kmods for these kernel modules. > This is found on some Lantiq / Intel reference boards. > > Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> > --- > package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk > b/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk > index 56cd0ec..f7f1101 100644 > --- a/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk > +++ b/package/kernel/linux/modules/hwmon.mk > @@ -328,6 +328,36 @@ endef > $(eval $(call KernelPackage,hwmon-gsc)) > > > +define KernelPackage/hwmon-tmp102 > + TITLE:=Texas Instruments TMP102 monitoring support > + KCONFIG:=CONFIG_SENSORS_TMP102 > + FILES:=$(LINUX_DIR)/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.ko > + AUTOLOAD:=$(call AutoLoad,60,tmp102) > + $(call AddDepends/hwmon,+kmod-i2c-core) > +endef
Do we have any policy on AutoLoad vs. AutoProbe? I guess AutoLoad is still used in many places, just wondering if new code should be using AutoProbe maybe? _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
