On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:28:19PM +0100, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> For decentralization - this is worh loking:
> https://safenetforum.org/t/maidsafe-and-gnunet-comparison/2779.
Huh.. there is no description of gnunet on that page at all.
dirvine explains some things of maidsafe that sound like they
also exist in gnunet. "self validating PKI component" - like
gnunet-core does it, or more like gnunet-identity or gnunet-gns?
"freedom for all the worlds people and that means
no web of trust, no human interference at all"
ouch, that sounds super wrong. check out secushare.org/security
for a glimpse on how many IoT problems can be solved with a
distributed private social graph. self-validation alone is
not enough. it needs to map to the reality of human beings,
which happen to be social.
next, janitor spends 3 mins looking at one out of 45 gnunet
subsystems and apparently misunderstands everything they see.
i recommend watching some nice talks on the subject:
45 subsystems of gnunet in 45 minutes, on:
https://psc2015videos.projectbullrun.org/
GNUnet Mesh Networking using CADET, on:
http://ybti.cheettyiapsyciew.onion/#30c3meshnet
GNS, distributed social graph with secushare etc on:
https://www.gnunet.org/internetistschuld
> Maybe some of scalable blockchain solution (Tendermint? Blockstack?)
> are also worth investigating.
>
> Telehash (http://telehash.org/) looks like a great candidate also.
http://about.psyc.eu/telehash
--
E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:
http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/lynX
https://psyced.org:34443/LynX/
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
