I personally think that calling initscripts by giving the full path looks like a ugly hack, and is also inconvenient (for me anyway).
Example: # /etc/init.d/network restart So I made a simple wrapper script that allows to call initscripts in a shorter way, and if the initscript name is misspelled or if the wrapper is called without arguments it will list all available init scripts in the /etc/init.d folder. With the wrapper the above would become: # service network restart I posted a PR with it https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/545 But I'm getting answers I don't understand. John Crispin nack-ed because it is "call delegation" (and because formal errors in place/title). Mathias Kresin nack-ed saying it is "bloat" because "lede is for embedded systems not for user systems". I mean, we have Luci and uci user interfaces already in LEDE, why is this simple 5-line script wrapper to call initscripts wrong? -Alberto _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
