On 10/01/2016 02:06 AM, Lars Kruse wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Am Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:39:39 +0300
schrieb Daniel Petre <daniel.pe...@posteo.net>:
CONFIG_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS=y
CONFIG_TARGET_SQUASHFS_BLOCK_SIZE=256
You could try setting the blocksize to 1024 - this should make a
noticeable difference as squashfs can compress better.
Awesome! I saved like 70K on a 4MB wr841n v8 by going from 256 to 1024 !
please note, that better compression due to a greater blocksize comes at the
cost of increased RAM consumption.
I have tested few routers and the results are:
router size diskfree memfree
tp-link wdr3600 256 1292k 88600k
tp-link wdr3600 512 1360k 82784k
tp-link wdr3600 1024 1492k 77656k
d-link dir615h2 256 96k 7420k
d-link dir615h2 512 328k 4500k
d-link dir615h2 1024 400k 3696k
nexx wt3020h 256 1168k 27416k
nexx wt3020h 512 1312k 21652k
nexx wt3020h 1024 1404k 16892k
for me personally 512 seems a reasonable choice.
Lars
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
