On 15/09/2016 22:41, Alberto Bursi wrote: > Note that I'm not talking about the wiki. That was not a major issue as > being a separate thing it can be set up unofficially, or whatever. > I am just arguing about principles here, as I'm spotting a possibly bad > pattern where the same bad practices of OpenWRT can bite again.
i am spotting that you are missing the point. i agree that your thread of argumentation was valid fro owrt. things were often not possible without the approval of the grandmaster. here things are different. we dished out commit access to lots of people. opened up the comms, became very transparent and after you guys started a discussion on how the wiki should go we did not intervene but simply endorsed it. this is very far from the old pattern of modus operandi. however your call for strong leadership and guidance sounds like a wish to return to that which i think most people do not want to do. you are free to do as you please. if you need something from other community members simply ask and you will get an answer. _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev