@Aaron Z > Agreed. > I am familiar enough with flashing, configuring and Wiki editing that > I am comfortable/willing to work on editing/cleanup of whatever wiki > is chosen, however, my availability will be spotty until Nov as we are > about to enter the busy season at work (12+ hour days M-F and 6-8 more > hours on Sat). > I do not consider myself competent to setup the backend for such a > wiki, but I am willing to work with the pages and clean up as I have > time.
I am in the middle of a busy season at my job as well but I will consistently have a few hours every week to put into the wiki for the foreseeable future. If the project needs someone to set up and run the infra I can volunteer, at least for the setup and administration in the short term. @Bill Moffet >I'll throw out another candidate: Twiki (twiki.org). > >I have used it, I wasn't crazy about it, but it had some nice features. And I >cannot say with >certainty how it would map into our use for LEDE. What were the features that you liked from Twiki? It's quite possible that we could install some extensions to Dokuwiki that can give us similar functionality; there's a pretty active community around them. I'm certainly not opposed to using other Wiki software either; my only real opinion is that there are better options than the classic standby, Mediawiki. Besides that and Doku, the only other one I've personally hosted is MoinMoin, and I don't really recommend it. I guess I've run Confluence too but unless someone's got a friend at Atlassian it's not really viable. One of the ones I've always been interested in is Gollum; it powers the Github wikis. [1] I'm not sure if it piques anyone else's interest. I think that access control is only available via a patch though. -- J [1] https://github.com/gollum/gollum/wiki On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Aaron Z <aczlan+le...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:26 PM, J Mo <jm...@jmomo.net> wrote: >> On 09/09/2016 05:17 PM, nobody in particular wrote: >>> we should >> Less "We oughta" >> More "I will" > > Being as: > 1. OpenWRT is on DocuWiki (and it seems to work fairly well) > 2. There doesn't seem to be a burning reason to switch to something else > 3. (most importantly) There are three people (Rich Brown, Tomasz End > and Josh Farwell) who (if I am reading their emails correctly) are > willing, capable and able to work on porting the data over to a LEDE > DokuWiki > > I would say lets move forward with DokuWiki. > > Just my $0.02 > > Aaron Z > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev -- Josh Farwell #971-235-4868 josh.farw...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
