Does this actually preserve what O_PATH implies or does it just make it compile properly when people use the O_PATH attribute?
Cheers,
Karl P
Hans Dedecker <dedec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker <dedec...@gmail.com>
> ---
> inittab.c | 4 ++++
> utils/utils.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/inittab.c b/inittab.c
> index 6dde11a..ae2c431 100644
> --- a/inittab.c
> +++ b/inittab.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,10 @@
> #include "procd.h"
> #include "rcS.h"
>
> +#ifndef O_PATH
> +#define O_PATH 010000000
> +#endif
> +
> #define TAG_ID 0
> #define TAG_RUNLVL 1
> #define TAG_ACTION 2
> diff --git a/utils/utils.c b/utils/utils.c
> index 8f14aad..e239eda 100644
> --- a/utils/utils.c
> +++ b/utils/utils.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,10 @@
>
> #include "../log.h"
>
> +#ifndef O_PATH
> +#define O_PATH 010000000
> +#endif
> +
> void
> __blobmsg_list_init(struct blobmsg_list *list, int offset, int len,
> blobmsg_list_cmp cmp)
> {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
