Hi, some Linksys devices (i.e WRT1900AC, EA4500, EA8500,...) have two
different partitions for dual boot, and an additional partition that
Linksys uses for system config (sysconf).
Each of these partitions is of a considerable size (23-37 mb, varying
between devices).
As far as I could see, the ports already in Owrt/LEDE (Kirkwook & Mvebu)
use only one partition at a time for the overlayfs, so total 23-37mb
shared among squashfs rom and ubifs overlay.
In some cases the third partition (sysconf) is mounted, but in /mmt, not
taking part in the overlay, and so not directly useful for installing
additional packages.
I believe that a way to better profit all this available space would be
to leave one partition for the rom squashfs alone (23-37mb there) and
share the 3rd partition between alternative boots as the ubifs overlay
(another 23-37mb here). In total we double the space up to a full 74mb
for packages, reducing the need for extroot.
Have you found any serious disadvantage on this approach, and that's why
it is not implemented in mvebu/kirkwood? If so, which one?
If we leave ubifs outside the image, and only squash in one MTD, does it
add any benefit to have squash image on top of an UBI layer? Erase
counters would be lost between firmware flashes anyway and no other
write would occur in between. On the other hand, in the third MTD (i.e.
sysconf) the erase counters could be preserved between firmware updates,
as the ubi block doesn't need to be recreated each time, and only a
ubiformat could be performed on flash.
I'm planning on switching ipq806x/EA8500 to this scheme, and would
appreciate opinions first.
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
