On 2016-05-19 01:17, Stijn Tintel wrote: > On 17-05-16 23:37, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2016-05-17 23:12, Daniel Golle wrote: >>> * build for pentium4 instead of i486 >>> * enable PAE >>> * enable EFI support >>> * enable KVM guest and host support > Is anyone running KVM on a 32bit host? I would leave out KVM host > support here. >> I like this change, but I think I'll wait a bit before applying it to >> see if anybody else has some comments about it. >> > I too think x86 and subtargets need some love, but let's not rush > things. Maybe now is a good time to discus other things related to x86 > as well. > > E.g., a while ago I created a profile for x86/64 for the PCEngines APU2, > but never submitted it, so I put it at [1] now. Last year, on > OpenWrt-Devel, Felix suggested [2] instead. I would like to hear others' > opinions about this too. > > And if any else has other ideas... Looking forward to hear them. > > Stijn > > [1] > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/stintel/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/apu2 > [2] > https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2015-November/037035.html I made that suggestion regarding the APU2 subtarget, because the Imre Kaloz was objecting to making the x86/64 subtarget more generic, and he was the maintainer of it. Now that the maintainership situation has changed, a separate subtarget is no longer necessary.
Since x86 is not disk/memory constrained, I also think we should avoid adding a profile for these devices. I would like to have the default image just work on these things. - Felix _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
