/* sending again because i hit 'reply' instead of 'reply all' :) */ On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:29 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > ok, there had been some discussion about building a super daemon that > runs, then ld-preloading bind() and co and using ubus to transport > sockets around. using caps or /proc sounds like a good i between until > such a daemon exists >
Most daemons I know of that need to bind to ports <1024 start as root and after binding to the port they drop privileges to the privileges of the user specified in their config file. For those daemons just adding a user and specifying it in their config file should be enough. For the daemons that don't need to bind to <1024 just starting them from their own user account is ok as they don't need additional privileges. For example the dnsmasq daemon has these options: # If you want dnsmasq to change uid and gid to something other # than the default, edit the following lines. #user= #group= I don't think that integrating such functionality in ubus or some other LEDE-only super-daemon is a good idea. Config options + capabilities for those daemons withut such options is a good way of doing this in my opinion. Also use different users for different daemons, as others said. Radu _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev