Hi all, I just wanted to point out that there is a bit of a conflict between the notion of having only a small numbers of merge-to-master committers and the current rules where committers are the ones who get to vote and the idea of having a broader consensus mode of governance.
Either 'committers' would need to be more than just merge-to-master committers (e.g. a larger group of people who have staging trees and are responsible for managing them so that the merge committers can merge them), or the voting membership would need to include non-comitters (which might be relevant anyway given the notion that voting should include power users / developers in a approximately 50 / 50 split). Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
