-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Daniel, I like what you said. I hinted something like that in the original message.
I don't like the idea of making changes to history after it is published. Personally, I don't care about commit pollution but if the team thinks it is important, then we should squash commits before we merge with master. In an ideal world, we'd make all commits on master and we'd have 100% confidence that each commit is guaranteed to cause no regression. If wishes were fishes... Maybe require all commits in master be signed and encourage but not require signing for others? Would that be acceptable? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQJRBAEBCgA7BQJXLTagNBxLdXNoYWwgSGFkYSAoZGV2ZWxvcGVyKSA8a3VzaGFs ZGV2ZWxvcGVyQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4ACgkQJsInd2b1xmMrmA//bDIfIJ+r2WHWNJlD PwZ/VG9cbiUBAmdiVZkOhP0W9J25GffIfDs+s411QfK6tNM4mIwl7dC/dHk/fQUJ 53lKL7WoRHmOHlOzocMynsjhsm4aib76afNKBA3+b0mU8t2c6JYFWNe7EbFhQAV6 JrTjhW7k9nz8A/hfrTvzlh+qSzOgD3NuMbDPATtDCGao6+RVYtQAI3PuSr01rGM6 4ogFIjKitWUQd/ci2yw6xoIU//4jswAnbETdt2Eqf8J+vnOxX9Z8VEriJn1wD/t3 i0T9MQcHyCTUAKcoxz2fr4CFkHq6RA55Nmy25Um6IN1N62Yb3Hc9yAMID1BIAtyA HCLZwzTm+H6jyeXYH7fECiM9jJrWhWbt2oBLABldd7GsU2fxxH2JcHs/3LK7wfux PuO3NoOm1OydxR4A/A0l0PmMQvlsS0EFN4JI53ENboLnEYkeY/j0hBkrMpTxTGUy 8+1tJYD8DV4wKHqAZ6CNdMIU6yD7ePRAvEvHsetKxEDbhXL/AVZYpvshuQ+e/9gk N3rRSdgyAIUOF4Jnt71Y1QUjLM2RSxUZw04nNxkpdmWTiBEFXRh50cdas8sc2Ukf rBqsyTEyOaUWPn5zK/OyVikzKzF/7fCFefTQMpO6ohJ774igttsMzzqrVpqyI88Q xAuNA4RfA4rz10bgI4Z0wTwRasM= =attX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev