Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>> Luca Olivetti schrieb:
>>>> En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
>>>>
>>>>> It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
>>>> So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
>>>
>>> Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
>>> fix them.
>>
>> hmm... current openmoko versions are eabi, but when I run a testapp
>> build by such fpc I get:
>>
>> Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
>> 0x000129d0 in SYSTEM_FPSYSCALL$LONGINT$$LONGINT ()
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x000129d0 in SYSTEM_FPSYSCALL$LONGINT$$LONGINT ()
>> #1 0x00012e1c in SYSTEM_FPGETRLIMIT$LONGINT$PRLIMIT$$LONGINT ()
>> #2 0x0001eef8 in SYSTEM_CHECKINITIALSTKLEN$LONGWORD$$LONGWORD ()
>> #3 0x0001efbc in SYSTEM_init ()
>> #4 0x0001a7ec in fpc_initializeunits ()
>> #5 0x0000e668 in main () at gtk2query.pp:263
>
> I tried something more. I compiled FPC without FPC_ARMEL, but tweaked
> init_settings.fputype:=fpu_soft in globals.pas so it would use soft fpu.
>
> Now my testapp crashes on the first librarycall (how surprising), but
> passes the fpc_initializeunits (and manages to do some writeln).
> From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess there
> is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
As Luca suspected, this is the wrong way :) You've a kernel with old
syscall support. You should find out why it crashes with -dFPC_ARMEL.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
