Sebastian Günther wrote:
Micha Nelissen schrieb:
I think on windows, it's not "forbidden" to put the version number in
the number, e.g. msvc, and delphi vcl do it. So having the major version
in the name seems most logical.
If that doesn't work, we could add a stub function
"GetLibraryVersionNumber" that could return the value. Messy but it
would work and be stable.
Yes. But what about having e.g. version 2.0 and 2.1, where 2.1 is
backwards compatible to 2.0, but introduces new functions. How should
an application distuingish between a "real" 2.0 DLL and a 2.1 DLL,
when both have the same filename?
Calling the function ?
Regards
David
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
