http://promoting-fpc.lordzealon.com is a wiki I hosted for try to help the comunity.
If FreePascal/Lazarus Team want to make this web official, i don't have any problem to host it for free.
Maybe you should state explicitly what you want or expect from other people ?
I don't want or expect nothing. This web is of all for all. But i don't have time to write on it at the moment. When I wrote the first time about this initiative, very people agreed about this, so i created the wiki for this because some people are interested in the initiative.
Is easy for me see to other side and "close" this wiki.But I thought would be interesting a web exclusively about FPC/Lazarus Promote-Propaganda-Publicity-etc....but I don't have time (now) to wrote some articles on it, and, see to other side, is not the right way.
As I said, I don't expect/want nothing, if the community don't want this wiki, then I close it, and nothing else matter (I don't know if this _expression_ is correct)
2006/7/13, Tiziano - Mekar Srl - <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree, let's push it on the rail, ok?I wrote my little article about "Freely programming with Free Pascal and Lazarus" aimed to get the attention of italian people to try and use it.It's in italian language and actually it is hosted here: http://www.linuxtrent.it/Members/tiziano_mk/fpc_lazarus.pdf/viewI think this could be enough, by now, and I am now working on another italian article about deeper details about Free Pascal.Following this thread, I understand that the right place to put articles of this kind should be this: http://promoting-fpc.lordzealon.combut is it official? It will be linked on the Lazarus Home page? Is this the right place even for material in Italian (and other) language?I would like a kind advice about this matter before spending my time working on this.byetiziano
From: Lord ZealoN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lazarus] About Promoting-FPCThis Thread is going OffTopic
2006/7/13, Marc Weustink < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Al Boldi wrote:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>
>>Al Boldi wrote:
>>
>>>See the 'FPC performance profile' thread.
>>
>>I reread the thread, you stated something, some other users couldn't
>>reproduce, so what do you expect for an answer ?
>
>
> Did you try it on your system?
No, for several reasons.
1: I don't beleave in performance issues which are just a for loop
2: There was a reply that it did work
3: I read those messages at work, there I don't have fpc, so I have to
test it at home. When I'm home I forget all messages read, unles important.
4: there wasn't much followup, so no further invertigations by others,
so no new mail notification, so not important.
5: I don't start digging in every ussue reported at the mailinglist,
unless it looks serous. I rather prefer to spend some time in developing
Lazarus itself.
6: for issues like this, the first thing to do is compare the difference
in generated assembler, compile witn -al
7: real issues should be reported in Mantis.
> Also, I have another case involving TStringList which exhibits the same
> problem.
Examples, testcases and proof.
Marc
_________________________________________________________________To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
--
::Mi blog::
http://blog.lordzealon.com###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
--
::Mi blog::
http://blog.lordzealon.com
