On 3/15/06, Darius Blaszijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not shure, but I guess that the contents will not be changing so much
> anymore for the widgets. Only once in a while some components get done. So
> you need to change text and style of the cell, hardly difficult to maintain
> I think.
Well, to start with, the current contents are completely wrong. I just
put anything to start with. They need to be changed to the real
values.
Also, I am not talking about the work of adding new widgets, but
rather the work of adding the ones that exist now and also of the work
of changing the style. Let's say we decide that another yellow is
better. The work to change all cells is huge. I think there is a
better way to do that table.
> If it's not too much trouble you can adjust the stylesheet, but the work for
> maintaining will be more or less the same, so why bother changing.
Why it will be the same? With a style you only change on one place and
it affects all cells of that style. Without it you need to manually
edit all of them.
I think we could have 4 styles:
* Green #88ff88 - Working
* Yellow #ffff88 - Partially Implemented (Is there a shorter word for
that?). I added this because "In Progress" indicated that someone is
working on it, but there are some widgets that are partially
implemented and no one is working on it.
* Red #ff8888 - Not Implemented
* Blue #8888ff - In Progress
Those are background colors and I think that the style should also set
the contents of the cell to be centralized.
thanks a lot,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
