On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:10:31 +0200
Matthijs Willemstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I have the following code:
>
> type
> TFoo = class
> procedure FooProc;
> end;
>
> After invoking code completion the skeleton of procedure TFoo.FooProc is
> created. Then I change the definition to read as follows:
>
> type
> TFoo = class
> procedure FooProc(AValue: TWhatever);
> end;
>
> Pressing <ctrl><shift>C (thus invoking code completion) a new skeleton
> for procedure TFoo.FooProc is made. I think this is not the correct
> behaviour. Either it should do nothing at all, or it should adapt the
> previously created version.
> Any opinions on that?
I would prefer automatic adapting too.
But some Delphians would expect something different:
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc(AValue: TWhatever);
end;
procedure TFoo.FooProc;
begin
end;
will be completed to
type
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc;
procedure FooProc(AValue: TWhatever);
end;
procedure TFoo.FooProc;
begin
end;
procedure TFoo.FooProc(AValue: TWhatever);
begin
end;
So, the we should add automatic adapting as a checkbox to the class
completion options.
What about this:
TFoo = class
procedure FooProcA;
procedure FooProcB;
end;
change to this
TFoo = class
procedure FooProc1;
procedure FooProc2;
end;
Now, you don't know, which procedures corresponds.
What should happen?
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
