On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:43:00 +0200
Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I know the issues. Now I wonder how well is USE_SYNCHRONIZE tested
> > since it's not the default option.
Synchronize doesn't make the LCL thread-safe, it just "works around" the
problem. I am fairly sure the TThread.Synchronize in itself works okay, but on
linux it would imply linking with the C library, and that's why there's still a
define for it IIRC (but I'm not 100% sure).
> I just made a quick test with an old copy of lazarus (0.9.6) I had
> installed in windows (where USE_SYNCHRONIZE is enabled by default): if I
> use synchronize I get a lot of 'thread' lines in memo1 insted of one per
> call.
Works fine for me with lazarus CVS and fpc 2.0.1.
Micha
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
