>> For what else should I use UTF8delete if not for UTF8strings?
>For "UTF8 strings".
>An "UTF8String" and an "UTF8 String" are two different things for the
>compiler. See below.
>For "UTF8 strings".
>An "UTF8String" and an "UTF8 String" are two different things for the
>compiler. See below.
What is the difference? The link does not tell me.
As fas as I know, there is no (useful) usage of LazUTF8-Routines
with strings of other encodings than UTF8.
So why is it used?
So why is it used?
And was not the addition of encodings to strings
introduced to overcome all this encoding hassle?
So the FCL should be able to use a different encoding than the LazUTF8-Routines.
It makes no sence to use the LazUTF8-Routines for strings other than UTF8Strings.
So the FCL should be able to use a different encoding than the LazUTF8-Routines.
It makes no sence to use the LazUTF8-Routines for strings other than UTF8Strings.
Who would do this? The outcome would be an invalid UTF8String.
Therefore, whenever I use LazUTF8-Routines I would always
have an UTF8String to be manipulated and I am forced to do
conversions in any case anyway.
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
