On 2013-10-26 11:45, Sven Barth wrote:
> If we could say that with enouh conjfidence, I'd gladly shift my
focus to fcl-passrc.
The main tests for what FPC supports and what not is for one compiling
(or in this context at least "parsing") the compiler's source, the RTL
and the packages. Additionally there are the tests which should either
succeed or dail to compile/run (and when a new feature is added at
least one test is added). So in my opinion the ability to correctly
parse compiler, RTL and packages sources plus correctly parsing all
tests that should compile and failing all tests that should fail would
be enough in my opinion.
OK, then. I'll take a look at that one. Thanks.
> Naturally <g> I know nothing about the importance of heap especially
in this context or probbaly in any relevant context.
> How hard would it be?
As non-shared heap is the default, this would be no problem ^^
I am having difficulty interpreting '^^'.
What is it meant to mean?
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
