Am Monday 01 August 2011 11:58:33 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd: > Taking that into account, I thought it worth taking a closer > look at a number of systems. > > Slackware x86 8.1 with desktop: neither lsb_release nor xdg-open. > > Slackware x86 13.37 with desktop: no lsb_release, does have xdg-open. > > Debian armel Lenny headless: neither lsb_release nor xdg-open. > > Debian armel Lenny with desktop: neither lsb_release nor xdg-open. > > Debian armel Squeeze with desktop: has lsb_release, no xdg-open. > > Debian mipsel Squeeze with desktop: has lsb_release, no xdg-open. > > Debian zSeries Lenny with desktop: neither lsb_release nor xdg-open. > > Debian x86 Lenny with desktop: neither lsb_release nor xdg-open. > > Debian x86 Squeeze with desktop: both lsb_release and xdg-open. > > Debian SPARC Etch with desktop: both lsb_release and xdg-open. > > Debian SPARC Lenny with desktop: both lsb_release and xdg-open. > > Solaris (8 and 10) have neither lsb_release nor xdg-open as standard. > Same probably applies to BSD. just out of curiosity is cat /etc/*-release
working? -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
