Hi,

While following some of the discussion about "FPC and Lazarus on ARM" it made me think of a question I wanted to ask any Linux users, and I know here are quite a few.

Is it only Ubuntu that cannibalized the Linux run-levels beyond recognition, or is the same thing done in Debian too? I have zero experience with Debian.

eg:
 * Ubuntu doesn't have the standard run-levels defined like normal
   Linux distros (eg: Slackware, Fedora etc) have.
    - There is no "Multiuser without NFS" - run-level 2
    - No "Full Multiuser mode" console login - run-level 3
    - X11 - run-level 5
   In Ubuntu run-levels 2-5 are all the same thing. F**ken stupid!

 * Ubuntu use something called upstart which seems to have no editor
   or any logic behind controlling what should start when. Run-Levels
   have worked fine for decades, so why did Ubuntu have to break it!


On a side note:
---------------

 [warning: ranting on, so you might want to stop reading here]

In recent weeks I have been taking a look at various Linux distros again - something I haven't really done for the last 8 years. Just to see what is out there, because I have been using Ubuntu as my sole Linux distro since 6.06. Overall, it seems Linux distros are getting worse and worse with every release.

  * They can't standardize on a technology. Lets take audio. First
    something else, then OSS, then ALSA, then PulseAudio... what next,
    and in how many months? A technology can never mature under Linux.
  * DBUS, HAL etc is in the same boat as audio. Technology used keeps
    changing every few months, so something totaly different and
    untested.
  * All recent distros seem to have screwed-up audio. How damn difficult
    can it be??? It just works under Mac OS X, Windows, Haiku, OS/2
    etc.. I tried Fedora 14, Ubuntu 10.04... My audio mixer volume
    settings are all set at 100%, yet I can hardly hear anything when
    an application plays sound. This used to work just fine in Ubuntu
    8.04.4, on the exact same system!
  * Switching desktop environments (Gnome -> KDE) on the same system
    gives me totally different audio levels!
  * KDE 4.x is rubbish compared to KDE 3.5 (it's like Vista for Linux)
  * Gnome is getting slower by the minute!
  * X11 seems overall slower than a few year back.
  * Fonts look totally different between KDE, Gnome etc when switching
    desktop environments on the same system. How damn hard can this
    really be as well, to get a consistent end-user experience... after
    all, they all run on the same X11 GUI.
  * Newer distros can now successfully make my P4 3Ghz laptop with 2GB
    memory and a 128MB ATI Radeon video card come to a crawl - with a
    new install! Where are the days when Linux was fast and nippy! Even
    Windows 7 runs faster on that system than Linux.

I'm seriously running out of OS options here. Linux is frustrating the hell out of me. Mac OS X doesn't run on my PC system. Windows is not something I want to go back to, after experiencing the flexibility that Linux had to offer. Haiku has great potential, but still to young for a day-to-day work system. Maybe it's time I go back to my typewriter - it never crashed on me, and the audio level (clicking sound as you type) was at a consistent level even when I changed paper or the ribbon. :-)


Regards,
  - Graeme -

--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/


--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to