On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:04:24 +0300 Max Vlasov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Paul Ishenin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 23.11.2010 13:54, Max Vlasov пишет: > > > > I suppose I should report an issue, but just > >> wondering, is it hard (if it full reproducible) to run another instance > >> of Lazarus and debug it, so the report could contain more information > >> saving the developers' time? > >> > > > > Nothing difficult. Open lazarus.lpi in lazarus and press Run. Better to > > have RTL compiled with debug info. > > > > > Thanks, Paul > > Finally it worked although along the way I managed to solve some problems > and set up two instances of Lazarus working at the same comp. > > By the way, the bug listed as solved ( > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17437) probably still exist. Actually > the makefiles in the folder \components\lazcontrols are the only one that > occasionally contains extra relative up and after that Lazarus down > (../../../Lazarus/lcl instead of ../../lcl), That probably means you are mixing packages from two Lazarus source directories. This is allowed, although in case of lazcontrols this is almost always a bad idea. I'm not sure where to put a warning for this case. > so there's no problem for those > who have the root compilation folder named accordingly and the one who has > it different (mine was LazComp and nearby older lazarus in Lazarus folder, > so I got wrong unit version error since lcl in that folder was > older-compiled). Should I just leave a note there or issue a new bug? Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
