2010/10/12 Bo Berglund <[email protected]>:
>>So a mere discussion in Jan 2008, not even two years ago and only 10
>>months before the release you are using, is surely no reason why it
>>should have been fixed by now.
>
> Interesting, why is the release I am using so old when it is the
> latest available on the download page at SF (for Windows)?
> But the SF page lists the version as dated 2009-10-26, not 2008-10-xx
> as you suggest. Still about a year old.
>

Sorry, I miscalculated a year, and counted since January 2009.

Vincent

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to