On 08/10/10 12:24, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 08/10/10 10:51, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
This thread is a summary of intermittent experience over the last year
or so with Lazarus running natively on various platforms. I hope to
cover ARM, PPC, SPARC and (for completeness) x86 on Linux (Debian v5
"Lenny"), possibly also some older Windows OSes on x86 (NT, W2K); I'm
afraid that I don't have an x64 system which I think would cover all
currently-supported CPUs.
Mattias, noting your
0.9.29 with fpc 2.4.0 or higher.
I'll work with sources from svn. This might mean that I'm a day or so
behind in some cases since some of the older machines will take more
than a day doing a full build.
ARM (armel) on Debian "Lenny"
-----------------------------
EAccessViolation : Access violation
$00086C50
$000F6A30
$00140F5C
$0011FF78
$0013648C
$0013FDA0
$00140950
$0011FF78
$0013648C
$0013FDA0
$00140950
$0011FF78
$00024370
$00008304
Why don't you build your compiler with -O- -gl?
I thought I had but I'll check... the version of the compiler I'm
running was built with make NOGDB=1 OPT=-gl -vt -dFPC_ARMEL -CfSOFT all
which I've generally found to give usable backtraces etc. Is adding -O-
a useful precaution?
Well, I'm not sure which optimisations are debugger safe, so I usually
disable them all. I pass OPT="-dFPC_ARMEL -O- -gl" and that seems to
work for the traces. I don't know if it'll help in your case, though.
Henry
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
