On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 11:29:10AM +0300, ik wrote: > > Not really. UTF-8 is implemented in such a way that it is indeed > > possible to treat it as Extended ASCII in this case. > > > > How is so ? here is a multi-byte char: ?? . It takes more then a word to be > used, so you can not do S[i] because it will provide you only part of the > char (one byte).
Identifier scanning in unicode enabled languages is usually changed from determining which chars are allowed to which ones are explicitely not allowed. (whitespace, first char not a (standard) number) etc. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
