José Mejuto wrote:
Hello Lazarus-List,
Friday, April 16, 2010, 3:02:37 PM, you wrote:
Is there any reason to be published instead public ? Maybe to garantee
that the functions will never be removed by fpc/linker if not directly
used in the code ?
MW> there is a "virtual" classtree build based on RTTI. RTTI is only
MW> generated for published methods
So this limits the possibility of the LCL to left out parts not being
used in the program, as every class and method is references in some
way by a published method.
Yes, you correct. Thats one of the reasons of the big hello world. We
will move this to interfaces someday after 1.0 or so.
And now the question :) should I in LCLfpgui move the public methods
to published section (when ancestor is published of course) ? It is
just to get a more hint clear compilation.
IMO yes.
Marc
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
