On Wednesday 02 December 2009 10:23, Marc Weustink wrote: > zeljko wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 08:37, Paul Ishenin wrote: > >> For 1.0 rc1 we need to fix 1.0 win32 bugs. Maybe not all the bugs in the > >> tracker with 1.0 target are really has 1.0 target. But at least we need > >> to review all and decide about each of them. > >> > >> For 1.0 rc2 we need to do the same but for the gtk2 widgetset. And here > >> we need a help of community. We need to close all gtk1 bugs but we also > >> need to check wether the bugs are present in our gtk2 interface. If they > >> are present then first we need to change their widgetset to gtk2 and > >> decide whether they are 1.0 bugs. > >> > >> I think 1.0 rc3 will be the last rc release and to release it we need to > >> review remain 1.0 IDE bugs. > >> > >> This is my view of road to 1.0 and it can differ from ideas of other > >> developers. > > > > It's nice view, but it takes only bugfixes into account. > > 1.0 should be interface freeze also. So eg. docking should be added to > > 1.0 rc1. > > It's easier (not easy but easier !) to fix bugs when we have clear vision > > of interface look.There's enough diff between 1.0rc1 .. 1.0rc3 to make > > interface changes if needed by those bugs. > > Exactly, imo, Rcs should be only fixing issues encountered in the > previous RC.
You are right if we say 0.9.30 is last interface changes version before rc1. If we want to release 1.0 in 12 months, it's time to re-discuss roadmap and necessary things todo. zeljko -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
