On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 04:03:17PM +0100, Werner Pamler via Lazarus wrote: > >> should go there independently of how this story ends here. I have > >> commit rights to Lazarus and can put it there. Any objections? > > > > Why not to use TEncoding provided with FPC 3? > > This is not the point. chm stores a Windows LCID to identify which > codepage is used for index and table of contents within the chm. > Therefore, LCID and codepage must be mapped to each other. This is what > Sergey's unit lcid_conv does. TEncoding does not have anything to do > with LCID.
No, but afaik an tencoding to lcid mapping would allow to convert? > I am no longer sure if it really fits into LazUtils because as I > understand now the unit is needed also for writing - no it should be > with the other chm units in (fpc)/packages/chm. If it can be sufficiently clean (just the plain wrappings and maybe a converter helper), it could be stuffed in rtl-unicode. CHM is probably not the only thing that uses LCIDs. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
