Il 25/10/2017 13:41, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus ha scritto:
No. The Delphi syntax is "ProcIdentifier:=Proc" or
"ProcIdentifier:=@Proc".
The "@Some:=" means assign something to address of Some. Which is bogus.
I guess Delphi's auto dereference actually translates this to
@Some^:=. Still bogus, but valid bogus.
From embarcadero doc wiki
(http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Tokyo/en/Procedural_Types_(Delphi)):
Procedural Types in Statements and Expressions
When a procedural variable is on the left side of an assignment
statement, the compiler expects a procedural value on the right. The
assignment makes the variable on the left a pointer to the function or
procedure indicated on the right. In other contexts, however, using a
procedural variable results in a call to the referenced procedure or
function. You can even use a procedural variable to pass parameters:
[snip]
The *@* operator can also be used to assign an untyped pointer value
to a procedural variable. For example:
var StrComp: function(Str1, Str2: PChar): Integer;
...
@StrComp:= GetProcAddress(KernelHandle, 'lstrcmpi');
This is no more true (as least as of X10 where I tested and it gave
rise to a compiler error), but it has been for a long time. That's why I
assumed that assigning an untyped pointer to a procedural variable was
both legal and also properly supported.
Giuliano
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
