On Fri, 5 May 2017, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
<lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
What tricks do you still need in 3.0.x ?
The annoying tricky part with our UTF-8 solution is the assignment of
Unicode string literals.
With UTF-8 BOM it does not work at all, as discussed here.
Without BOM it depends on string type + compiler settings in an illogical way.
We would need a more robust solution for that. Do you have ideas?
I propose to let the compiler observe the BOM.
But I don't think more is needed.
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
