El 24/10/2016 a las 2:19, Lars via Lazarus escribió:
Those are some interesting reads. It confirms my gut instinct to choose
chromium embedded (CEF) for development, instead of mozilla embedded, as
chromium embedded seems more designed for embedding at this stage than the
more immature firefox code.
Hello,
Yes, currently Chromium seems to be better, but anyway it will need a
lot of work starting from the CEF as if my brain serves me CEF API is
C++ so you will find the same problem as Qt interface, a very big DLL/so
to convert C++ to plain C functions that will need a quite good maintain.
I wonder how often chromium embedded breaks their api, or changes the V8
engine so that old stuff no longer works.
As far as I know it is quite stable now.
One thing I'd really like is a single DLL to ship with an application
instead of mounds and mounds of files that these embedded solutions
require. However I guess that's not going to happen.
No for sure, that will not happen :) unless you use some dirty tricks.
In the past I was able to "inject" 3 or 4 DLLs in my EXE and use them,
but only in 32 bits Windows and I was unable to port the code to the 64
bits windows loader (it basically performs the same actions Windows do
when load a DLL from disk, but the function loads it from a resource and
adjust the call pointers and other things as Windows will do it).
Of course that method will not with all DLLs.
--
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
