On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Gabor Boros via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > 2016. 10. 21. 10:25 keltezéssel, Juha Manninen via Lazarus írta: > I read, I read but if contains buggy example... ;-)
Mattias fixed the bug. > I need a quick and a rock solid solution. Is it good solution if replace all > Length, Copy, Delete with UTF8Length, UTF8Copy, UTF8Delete and read the > strings through with this for i:=1 to UTF8Length(s) do > Write(UTF8Copy(s,i,1))? No, it not a good solution! I predict that most your code can still use byte indexing. At some point you will get a Heureka-moment like "hey, I don't need the codepoint index when doing this task!". > I do not want to think of where Length, Copy, Delete is good and where UTF8* > needed. Well, you must think when coding. There is no shortcut. :) BTW, if you are worried about Delphi compatibility there is now unit LazUnicode available. See: http://wiki.freepascal.org/Better_Unicode_Support_in_Lazarus#CodePoint_functions_for_encoding_agnostic_code Juha -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
