Quoting "ALTENBACH,CHRISTIAN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Even weirder, if you take > your > VI and put a simple FOR loop around the code (no indexing) and set the > loop > counter to 2 so the core code executes twice, the VI takes 17 whole(!!) > seconds (4250000x slower/loop).
Sorry, my mistake! Of course since the call is recursive, the loop should not be inside it or it gets escalated in the recursive calls. :-) the rest of my comment is fine. Cheers Christian
