<P>Neville,</P>
<P>I just tried to do an SCXI strain gauge project with DAQmx and the most recent drivers and also had horrible experiences. I don't think the addressing of SCXI modules and channels is right. After my customer and NI didn't have any luck at it, I had to make an emergency plane trip to fix the system and ended up reverting to traditional DAQ. NI was supposed to be following up on this as of April 27th but I haven't heard any reports on what they've found. Sorry for not posting this earlier but...</P>
<P>DON'T USE DAQmx with SCXI!</P>
<P>--David Moore</P>
<P>P.S. We also found that strain gauge excitation worked under DAQmx for Windows, but broke when we switched to DAQmx for LabVIEW RT. I was able to rewrite the app as non-RT but obviously should have ditched DAQmx at that point.</P>
<P>&gt; &gt;Subject: Software bug with NI-DAQmx 7.1, 7.2 &amp; SCXI &gt;1125-SCXI 1313 &gt;From: "Neville Dholoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&gt;Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 07:09:59 -0700 &gt; &gt;Hi Guys, &gt; &gt;Just spent 2 days isolating a very specific problem that &gt;I had when &gt;using the SCXI 1125 module with the SCXI 1313 breakout &gt;board. &gt; &gt;I set up an analog input virtual channel in old style DAQ &gt;(7.1 and the &gt;latest version 7.2) and the corresponding global channel &gt;in DAQmx. &gt; &gt;The old style daq channel worked fine, but the DAQmx &gt;channel just read &gt;garbage. &gt; &gt;Repeated support calls (yes we signed up for the &gt;subscription!) didn't &gt;produce much help from NI. &gt; &gt;I finally narrowed it down to the specific channel range &gt;I was choosing &gt;(+/-15V). The old style daq allows you to specify the &gt;individual gain &gt;(on the specific SCXI 1125 channel) and attenuation &gt;(provided by the &gt;programmable breakout board). &gt;DAQmx does not. It automatically sets both these &gt;parameters based on &gt;signal input range. However, it looked like it set up &gt;the attenuation &gt;correctly, but the gain setting was probably wrong. &gt; &gt; &gt;Work-around: I had to use a daq channel on the PCI daq &gt;card instead, &gt;with a potential divider to bring the signal voltage down &gt;to +/-10V. &gt;Changing the code back to old-style daq was not an &gt;option, this late in &gt;the game. &gt; &gt;Hope this saves someone else some time. &gt; &gt; &gt;Cheers, &gt; &gt; &gt;Neville Dholoo &gt;Cellex Power Products, Inc. &gt;Richmond BC &gt;Canada &gt; &gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------- </P>



Reply via email to