On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:21:09 +0200 Henning Eggers <[email protected]> wrote: > Having said that, I am sorry to say that I find the current location > a Bad Choice, too. Frankly, I am surprised this passed UI review at > all. Three reasons for that:
I'm not sure why you're surprised this passed UI review, and that may be because there's a bit of confusion as to what a UI review is. A UI is not a QA review. It's simply not realistic to go through every affected page and see what might be changed. I trust the submitter to have thought about that, and demonstrate it in the UI review. As a UI reviewer, I look at the UI a submitter presents to me, and I think about things that would make this change specifically bad. If I can't think of anything, I think of something that might make it better. In this case, I didn't have either. That's how it passed UI review. If you want my opinion, I think the registration section would be better if it was out of the crowded (and valuable) top area entirely. At the very least, in most "code" cases I think it's just noise anyway. That being said, the best UI reviews are reviews given to us by our users (in this case, it's you! :) On that alone I think it's worth implementing your change and see what the other users say. If Curtis is okay with it, I certainly would like to see it out. Essentially, you have a week and a half before you're completely committed to the UI for a month (release to release), so experimentation should be encouraged, especially in small changes like this. Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
