Roland Stigge <sti...@antcom.de> wrote: > at Debian, we found that there is > > http://mirrors.ctan.org/support/latex2html/latex2html-2012.tgz > > which wasn't announced as an official new release. See also > > http://bugs.debian.org/647433 > > Now I wonder if I should use this as the new official "upstream" version > to be built upon from now on? There are some doubts that I collected in > the above Debian bug report.
the author of this revision merely said "fix warnings in perl 5.14" i don't have any working latex that would work with latex2html, so i can't claim to know whether this is a reasonable. roughly speaking, with abandonware like l2h, we merely go by the licence. gpl implies (to us) that anyone can hack out a bug and re-release. Robin Fairbairns For the CTAN team _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list latex2html@tug.org http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html