Hello, Eike Apology and thanks for correcting my wrong suggestion, you are right Eike according to CLDR ( https://unicode-org.github.io/cldr-staging/charts/37/supplemental/languages_and_scripts.html) it is correct. I was little confused with the arbitrary use of @ and _ while translating various software like. Inkscape ( https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape/-/tree/master/po) that uses "sat" and sat@deva. and the same for sat_olck in other projects. In linux they use something different like sat_IN for some reason. I'm still not able to understand how code pairing is done, but they work :-/
As, Ol Chiki is now the official script for Santali language which means, the code "sat" should mean same as "sat-Olck" but here in Weblate (Libre) already "sat" code is occupied with Devanagari writings, means current "sat" code assigned in Libre ( https://translations.documentfoundation.org/languages/sat/) should be "sat-Deva" *my question* is will it not cause any confusion in future related to default script for Santali language. As for Santali Wikipedia ( https://sat.wikipedia.org) and in many places "sat" is the default code where the Ol-Chiki script is used. If anyone wishes to write in another script then let them change to their lexeme language codes like sat-Deva, sat-Latn, sat-Beng, sat-Orya etc. If it will cause little or no issue tyhem -- Thanks regards Prasanta Hembram -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
