Hi :) Yes, definitely only as a helper NOT as a replacement! However, looking back through the archives suggests that Michael is not the only one who finds that trying to use an MT actually slows him down and is more of a hindrance than a help.
I've not encountered TM before, i will have to look it up. Errr, i thought Pootle and other things were more helpful in having some sort of database where humans could look-up phrases and see how other humans had translated them. Still lacks context so nuances and such could still be dodgy. Is that how "fuzzy string"s appear? If Pootle doesn't have some functionality switched on then it's probably for a very good reason and has probably been discussed and decided before. I haven't checked the archives and probably wont have time to either, sorry! :( The main response i seem to be getting is that MTs are only good in a very limited way and probably only for very occasional use but it's really down to individual translators and which languages are being translated to or from. Thanks and regards from Tom :) On 3 November 2014 07:26, Rimas Kudelis <r...@akl.lt> wrote: > Hi, > Let me chime in here as well. First of all, Pootle has the ability to use > a configured TM. Couple options available out of the box are Google > Translate (which is an MT, not a TM service) and Aperture (which, if I > remember correctly, holds a collection of translated strings from a large > amount of open source software, and can suggest these translations to you). > In addition to this, there's apparently a lookup feature as well, with an > example config for Wikipedia. I'm not sure why we aren't using any of these > at the moment, but I guess we could turn them on, if needed. > > However, none of these features are even close to being a replacement for > a real human localizer being at the moment. They are mere helpers, and > nothing more. Surely, the level of accuracy varies by language, but > considering other replies, I guess even translations into English are bad > enough. As a user, I sometimes stumble upon software, which is "localized" > into Lithuanian using Google Translate (or something very similar). Tell > you what: on these cases I feel insulted by the idiocy of that app's > "localizer", because that person obviously didn't know at all what they > were doing and how shitty the outcome of their "effort" is. I can't tell > for sure that that outcome isn't helpful, but I really doubt that it is. > So, to summarize my point, we should never attempt to seed any locale with > machine translations. These are a good helper mechanism, but a bad base to > start building up on. > > By the way, writing this also reminded me of Google's Code-In programme > and what we should learn from it. GCI is similar to Google Summer Of Code, > but targets younger students to whom the participating projects assign > smaller than GSOC tasks. Among them, localization tasks were also > acceptable. So, some students quickly found a way to easily cash out the > rewards offered for completing these tasks, by using MT services. What's > worth learning from this is that there should always be a mentor within a > project who understands the target language well enough to at least tell > whether it looks like a result of MT. Otherwise it's just a waste of > rewards and its reputation. > > Regards, > Rimas > > On 2014 m. lapkritis 3 d. 00:03:21 EET, Tom Davies <tomc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >Hi :) > > > >Going off-topic (now that the original question has been solved), > >hopefully > >just briefly ... > > > >Of course Firefox (and many others) allows add-ons such as > >machine-translators. They are getting much better but are still > >hilariously bad quite often. Often they give just enough of a hint > >that i > >think i understand what someone is saying although i always wonder if > >they > >have sent me off in a wrong direction. > > > >My MT (i think "Quick translate"), gave me; > >"Hello! > >I ask you to add the Abkhaz language for translation > >Libre Office ver. 4.3.3.2 > >" > >Which made a lot of sense and it's good to have a respectable human > >confirm > >that because it gives me a little more confidence in the MT. > > > > > >I've often wondered if they might be "good enough" to get rough > >translations done well enough for humans to proof-read and polish? > >Perhaps > >just "good enough" to use alongside the human translators own skill and > >knowledge, perhaps to get some inspiration? Perhaps better for people > >who > >are only just starting to translate things? > > > >I've also wondered if it's easier to have paired teams. So in this > >case > >someone who is a native Russian-speaker but understands Abkhazian "well > >enough" to do first drafts and then a native Abkhazian-speaker to do > >proof-reading, ideally one who understands Russian (or English or > >something) just well enough to be able to look back at a source > >document to > >double-check that things haven't gone too far off-track. > > > >Does either of those ideas have any validity? Are they something that > >noobs or laymen often seem to think but turns out to be more work > >and/or > >less accurate than whatever different ways your teams use? > > > >Err, i am a typical English person and only understand 1 language at > >all > >and not even that great at that 1 so please forgive my noobishness in > >this > >post. > >Regards from > >Tom :) > > > > > > > > > >On 2 November 2014 19:17, Sophie Gautier <gautier.sop...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:10, "Andras Timar" <tima...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Sophie <gautier.sop...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > >> > > Hi and welcome, > >> > > Le 02/11/2014 17:30, Андрей Абухба a écrit : > >> > >> Здравствуйте! > >> > >> > >> > >> Прошу Вас добавить абхазский язык для перевода > >> > >> Libre Office ver. 4.3.3.2 > >> > > > >> > > Could you write in English? it will be much more easier for us to > >help > >> > > you :) > >> > > Thanks > >> > > Sophie > >> > > > >> > > >> > I think Andrey wanted us to add Abkhazian language to Pootle. I've > >> > just done that.(Probably he cannot write in English, and will > >> > translate LibreOffice from Russian to Abkhazian, but I don't know > >for > >> > sure.) Anyway, welcome Andrey, and you can start translating > >> > LibreOffice 4.3 UI in Pootle. > >> > >> Ha great! Thanks Andras. Andrey let us know which language is > >preferred for > >> you so we know who to ping to help you if you need it. > >> Cheers > >> Sophie > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > >> Problems? > >> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > >> Posting guidelines + more: > >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ > >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot > >be > >> deleted > >> > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > >Problems? > >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > >Posting guidelines + more: > >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ > >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > >deleted > > -- > Rimas > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
