Hi Michael, all,
On 06/08/2012 11:41, Michael Bauer wrote:
I must agree. One of the main reasons LO is attractive to users of my
locale is the fact that it HAS proofing tools for our language. I
already hate the thought of my inbox if this goes live because I'll be
at the receiving end of dozens of email complaining that the spellcheck
doesn't work anymore. Which should also be a consideration - perhaps it
seems like a time-saving exercise to say "we'll fix it later" but that's
a false economy and does not take into account the time which will be
wasted by users and support people trying to calm down and support irate
end users.
Whether this was picked up late or not should be immaterial, as long as
it's *before* the release that's early enough. That's why they are
pre-releases. We're going to be the laughing stock of the office
software world, including AOO, if this goes out.
So why don't you focus your users to use 3.5.x instead ? 3.6.1 will be
release very soon, may be they can wait for the next release too, we
(the development project that we represent) know that 3.6.0 won't be as
stable as 3.5.x series. How many of your community have tested the RCs
of this last version. Rejecting the fault and criticizing others won't
help to respect our release plan which is as important for the companies
providing tested and certified versions of our software as bug free
versions.
Again, I ask that question: what would be your solution to improve the
QA situation in the frame of our development process ?
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
