Pedro Lino píše v Čt 29. 03. 2012 v 19:06 +0100: > Hi all, > > Did anyone verify that the version info is updated (re the > secunia > reports problem) > > > I think Secunia has already fixed the numbering so that the warning it > gone for version 3.5.1. > > But the Version number in the file Properties for 3.5.2rc2 is now > 3.5.0.202 instead of 3.5.2.2 > > Unless there is an rc3 and this is fixed meanwhile LO is going to get > a bad image with Secunia (and all the security minded people :) )
Why could it cause bad image? IMHO, it was bug on the Secunia side and it is fixed now. We used this version scheme also for LO-3.4 and nobody complained. > Personally I couldn't care less about Secunia but since it only takes > a small number change, I think it would be worth the effort :) It looks trivial but it is not. We would need to do clean build for all systems, upload them to mirrors, restart smoketests, ... So, this change would delay the release by many days. Also, it is potentially dangerous. The version is defined and used on many locations. Any change could cause strange side effects. Also there are many scripts around that depends on a certain version scheme. So, we should not change this between rc2 and rc3 if there is not a big reason. Well, I agree that 3.5.0.202 is ugly. We are discussion to use the more reasonable version scheme 3.5.2.2 now, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-April/029263.html If it goes well, we might try it for 3.5.3 release. Best Regards, Petr -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
