Hi Peter, *, On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Peter V. Saveliev <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10.01.2012 14:08, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > <skip /> > >> So LO has the same "support" for it as OOo/Apache OOo has. > > > Has it? Excuse my ignorance, I thought that LO is forked from OOo and share > not every feature. Ok, I'm to check it in the repo.
The overlap between OOo and LO is very big - and as it shares a common history, the stuff that was added before the split is available in LO as well. See e.g. http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/s?hist=91226&project=core (search for commits that refer the bug 91226 in the commit) But of course since the changes are >2years old, it might be that they need some adaption - but this is the case anyway, be it OOo, LO or Apache OOo ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
