On 2011-06-14 11:33, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi Dwayne,
2011.06.14. 10:30 keltezéssel, Dwayne Bailey írta:
I know someone was looking into x-comment again, based on a review of
the easy hack webpages. Not sure how far it has progressed.
I have had a look into x-comment. Tools currently do not extract it
(they deal with 'abc-DE' language code format only).
is that because the tools haven't been setup to do it but can actually
extract them.
There are very few
x-comments in the source and even less meaningful x-comments, so I let
them alone for the time being.
Yes the current ones are horrible. But I'm not concerned about those.
What I was suggesting was that we have a debug language in Pootle. That
way anyone can contribute a fix to a source string. It would be simple
using pofilter to extract only those with changes and push those back
into the source. It does require someone to do that but it makes it
easy to push back a fix. Currently my guess is that none of us push
back source text fixes because its way too hard to do.
--
regards
Dwayne
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
