2010/11/9 Rimas Kudelis <r...@akl.lt>: > > Talking about this, would it perhaps be possible to license oficial builds > differently than source code? Instead of telling the user to agree to a > source license, we could probably present them with a short, understandable > and localized EULA.
LGPL is not an EULA. In fact I don't think we need an EULA. The users should be informed about their rights but they can install and use LibreOffice even if they don't accept LGPL. LGPL says nothing about installing and using free software, everyone is free to do that. Its terms should be followed only in case of redistribution and modification. > > However, if this is not possible, here's an alternate proposal: how about we > prepend the license with a localized string that would contain short > localized summary of the license, and explain in a few words that the > license itself is in English and that only English text is legally binding. > +1 (license.html, license.txt etc.) Andras -- E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
